Onto Innovation’s Monita Pau and Prasad Bachiraju contribute to the March 2024 edition of Semiconductor Digest.

Onto Innovation’s Doug Brown is pleased to publish, “The Great Lithography Debate: Copper Clad Laminate or Glass Substrates?” in the January-February 2024 issue of the Chip Scale Review.

Faster data transfer, greater heat dissipation, less power consumption and increased functionality are all qualities that chipmakers and their customers want from their devices. Since the dawn of the semiconductor industry, the pursuit of increasingly advanced nodes has served as the industry’s North Star. But for today’s voyagers, rough seas are ahead: these nodes have decreased in size, input/output (I/O) bumps on the chip have grown smaller—and with the shrinking of these bumps, their ability to mate directly to printed circuit boards (PCB) diminishes. The way to avoid this is to use advanced IC substrate (AICS), i.e., an intermediary substrate that enables progress in panel-level packaging (PLP) and chiplets.

Chiplets are a type of advanced packaging in which multiple die—such as memory, analog and other devices— are assembled in a single, large package along with a central processing unit (CPU) or graphics processing unit (GPU). With AICS, all of these chiplets can be co-packaged together in packages that may be as large as 120mm x 120mm each, which is a considerable increase from the 10mm x 10mm-sized packages of fan-out panel – level packaging (FOPLP). These large packages allow multiple die with smaller interconnects to be assembled and then redirected to larger contact bumps compatible with a PCB. None of this means the industry has left the pursuit of next-generation advanced nodes behind, or smaller packages for that matter.

Although the semiconductor industry has turned to chiplets and other advances to meet various next level performance needs and spur new innovations, advanced nodes remain key areas of development and advancement. But this move toward extra-large AICS packages signals the need for large exposure field, fine-resolution panel-level lithography systems that can expose entire panels using fewer exposures. The journey to a new era of chiplets and PLP, however, is fraught with challenges that must be overcome, including total overlay shift, yield loss and copper-clad laminate (CCL) substrate distortion. In this article, we will focus on these three challenges to the rapidly growing AICS market and outline several solutions that we have determined will enable manufacturers to address them.

“When will glass replace copper clad laminate on advanced IC substrates?”

That’s a question many on the heterogeneous integration (HI) side of the semiconductor industry are asking. Unfortunately, the answer is not straightforward.

But before we get to answering that, let’s take an advanced IC substrate (AICS) refresher. In other words, how did we get to the point where glass substrates have become a topic of discussion?

AICS provides a means to connect chiplets and passives with extremely high I/O count to the printed circuit board (PCB). In the process, AICS has facilitated a paradigm shift in packaging technology with the introduction of HI. This revolutionary approach to packaging provides a significantly cheaper alternative to silicon interposer technology, which is limited in the package sizes it can support.

The AICS is built around a fiberglass resin core with copper on both sides. This is known as copper clad laminate (CCL). The CCL facilitates the creation of redistribution layers (RDL) that connect through the substrate core with plated through holes (PTH). The RDLs are separated by organic dielectric layers known as build-up films.

All great voyages must come to an end. Such is the case with our series on the challenges facing the manufacturing of advanced IC substrates (AICS), the glue holding the heterogeneous integration ship together.

In our first blog, we examined how cumulative overlay drift from individual redistribution layers could significantly increase overall trace length, resulting in higher interconnect resistance, parasitic effects and poor performance for high-speed and high-frequency applications. To address this, layer to layer overlay performance data needs to be monitored at each layer. If the total overlay error exceeds specifications at any process step, and at any location on the panel, corrective action must be taken to mitigate the drift in total overlay.

For this second installment, we explored the issue of AICS package yield and its importance in fostering a cost-effective, production-worthy process. Unlike most fan-out panel-level packaging (FOPLP) applications, AICS has relatively few packages per panel. This enormous disparity impacts yield calculations dramatically. In the AICS production process, the main challenge is the real-time tracking of yield for every panel, at every layer, throughout the fab. The solution: using advanced automatic defect classification (ADC) and yield analytics to quickly address errors.

In this final article of the series, we explore how overlay correction solutions compensate for panel distortion effects induced by copper clad laminate (CCL) processing, which impacts yield and final package performance.